Since it's the Christmas season, I'd like to give all you Mamas of little boys (and no girls) a present. Especially those that are done with bearing children, but look wistfully at little girls and wonder, "Should we try one more time for a girl?".
My gift to you is to dispel some of the myths of having girls. It ain't no pink picnic, ladies!
Misconception #1: It's So Fun To Dress Them Up in all those Cute Little Girl Outfits
Well, the first one was fun. Until age 2. And then she suddenly sprouted opinions. Lots of them. First it was no dresses; then it was no turtlenecks; then it was nothing with sleeves that tickled her wrists (you just try to shop for that). And we went through one winter where she had to where socks on her hands all the time. Then the colors started to matter - and all the colors that I'd been buying that looked so beautiful on her were no longer acceptable. And since she was three, she's demanded to chose her own outfits. Not at the store - oh no, that would be too easy. I have to do all the guesswork at the store and then bring everything home and see if I guessed correctly. And did I get the memo that said that pants were out and only dresses were in? Of course not. I simply had all the pants I bought one season rejected with one regal arm wave and haughty sniff. And when I do get it right, you must remember that "matching" is a learned skill. How the heck they learn it when they refuse to listen to their mothers I have no idea.
The second girl-child stopped being fun to dress around 11 months. Everything tickled, itched or was just a big, "No!" As the language skills developed I learned that pretty much everything was "too tight, Mama," except for her big sister's clothes - her sisters favorite clothes; the ones sister didn't want to share. And colors? This one loved black. Do you have any idea how many outfits they make in 18 month size in black? About 2, and only at Christmas time. In summer, you're SOL.
So basically, for the last almost 4 years, I've been toting around girls who wear stripes and plaid together, all black, or ballerina tutus over their favorite sweats. They either look like Technicolor barf or a beatnik poet. And yes, I could put my foot down and insist they wear what I chose, but I'd be deaf from the screaming. That and I really do believe that as long as they're decent (no bathing suits in public or tutus with no underwear) their clothes are their self-expression and should be theirs to choose. But "fun" is not how I'd describe it.
Misconception #2: I Could Buy all those Beautiful Dolls if I Had Girls
My first one, no way. No dolls. The occasional glance at a Polly Pocket doll, but only for about 2 minutes. The beautiful doll house I bought to encourage roll-playing and imagination like the parenting books say? No interest. She prefers tissue and her fingers.
The second one? She loves dolls, it's true. But she prefers them naked. Absolutely starkers. So no nice collectibles for this house. And no doll that can't survive food being shoved in it's mouth or marker all over it's face.
Misconception #3: If I Had Girls, We Could Make Cookies Every Christmas!
I'll let you know when this one becomes viable. So far, cooking of any kind is not that Norman Rockwell scene we all imaged. Unless you found a Rockwell with flour everywhere, a mouth smeared with batter and angry tears on screaming faces because the chocolate chips went into the batter instead of their mouths.
Misconception #4: It's So Much Fun to Play with Girls' Hair - Ribbons and Bows Oh My!
This one is so wrong I don't even know where to begin. I've got one that wouldn't let anyone "style" her hair without a fight for 5 years. The other one has a sensitive scalp and screams like we're killing her every time we even touch a brush - who knows what the neighbors think.
When the older one was three, we had her hair cut in a perfect bob. She was so cute with that haircut it was shocking. Then, when I was distracted with the baby, she climbed on top of the trashcan to get to the drawer where we kept her kid scissors and proceeded to cut all her hair off. To the scalp, from one ear to the other, in the back. Didn't touch the bangs, but ravaged the rest. Took 18 months to grow that out to a pixie cut. Now she's furious that we "didn't let her" grow her hair long like "princess hair". Sigh.
"But now she's older, she lets you style it, right?" you may ask. Oh sure. But again, she has opinions! And I'm telling ya, a sense of style and aesthetics comes much later (I hope). I again subscribe to the rule of self-expression, so I while I try to suggest things, when she's adamant I do it as she wants it, to the best of my ability. I've gotten very adept at several style; the Unicorn, which involves sweeping all the hair I can get and the bangs into one pony tail in the center of her forehead; the Fountain, which is a single pony tail in the center of the head, sticking straight up; and the Tri-Tail, which strategically places three pony tails in a pattern of the wearer's whim. Yes, I could refuse, but don't underestimate the determination of a 5-year old. She'll stick elastic bands in her pocket and do it herself at school - knotting her hair so badly it'll take me 20 minutes to undo it at night. Seems better to let her discover her own sense of style and bear the odd looks of the other mothers.
So, there ya go, Merry Christmas, Boy Mamas. You aren't missing what you think you're missing. I wouldn't change a thing about my girls, but I think it's only fair to tell it like it is. Mothering girls isn't all ribbons and bows. It's more like tutus with PJs and turquoise tights under a dish-towel cape topped by Unicorn hair; baby dolls with molding goldfish crackers in their mouths and kitchens covered in spilled sugar and secretly tasted vanilla spit on the floor.
Paint THAT, Norman.
Recent Comments